Usama Hasan: Jihadist in Muslim Reform Movement & On Payroll of Quilliam Foundation Lies About Jihad "With Love"
Fought Jihad in Afghanistan in 1990 - Whitewashed Islamic State
MIM: Muslim Reform Movement member 'Imam Sheik Dr.' Usama Hasan is also on the payroll of the Quilliam Foundation.What a difference a fat salary as "ex extremist at Quilliam" and "Muslim Reform Movement member" makes! Veteran Afghan jihadist/salafist/recruiter Hasan would have infidels believe that jihad is really all sweetness and light and he refers to it as a "struggle for goodness".He presents this halal tripe with the blessings of "Your Founders of the Muslim Reform Movement" "with love"!
"(Imam Sheikh Dr) Usama Hasan is Head of Islamic Studies at Quilliam and was a founding advisor to the organisation in 2008. As a teenager Usama became a radical salafi activist and, whilst still a Cambridge undergraduate, briefly took part (1990-1) in the ‘Jihad' against Communist forces in Afghanistan. However following the 7/7 bombings in London, Usama took it upon himself to start campaigning against extremism and for religious reform within Muslim circles..."
"Dr. Hasan has served as a voluntary, part-time imam at various mosques in London and Cambridge for over 20 years. He has worked with the Islamic Sharia Council UK for the last four years, and hosted a weekly Question-and-Answer TV programme about Islamic Law on the popular English-language Islamic satellite channel, Islam Channel. While studying as an undergraduate at Cambridge University, he travelled to Afghanistan in 1990-1 and briefly trained and fought with the Muhajedin against the Afghan communist forces. Dr. Hasan is currently a member of the Academics and Theologians Roundtable, working with the Preventing Violent Extremism unit of the UK government. Dr. Hasan's background is the Ahl-e-Hadith branch of Islam, usually described as Salafi-Wahhabi."http://www.theglobalexperts.
MIM: In 2013 Usama Hasan whitewashed the Islamic State and claimed that the UK was more Islamic!
"On the 6th December 2013, Dr. Usama Hasan addressed a packed audience of 40 people at the Bristol University Multi-Faith Chaplaincy, an event organised by the Bristol City Circle. Topics were the history and development of Muslim political thought, and recent Islamist extremism and jihadism, from the 1979 Iranian revolution and siege of Mecca to 9/11, partly inspired by the unattainable goal of a pure, Islamic state.
Dr. Hasan argued, based on Islamic scripture and its mainstream, normative interpretation, that an ‘Islamic state', if such a thing existed, would be a just state, respecting basic human rights, freedoms and democracy. Furthermore, it would be obliged to help provide for people's basic necessities such as food and drink, housing, education, jobs and healthcare. Dr. Hasan stated that in this sense, "Britain is far more ‘Islamic' than many so-called ‘Islamic states'." The one-hour talk was followed by an animated discussion during which a leading humanist stated that "I would sign up to an Islamic state like that!" Another audience member quoted Muhammad ‘Abduh, the early 20th-century Grand Mufti of Egypt who said upon returning to his home country from a trip to Europe, commenting on the religious duty of promoting civic society, "In Paris I saw Islam but no Muslims. In Cairo I see Muslims but no Islam."
Quilliam would like to thank Bristol University, its Multi-Faith Chaplaincy, and the Bristol City Circle for hosting this event.
MIM:Hasan is working together with the head of the OIC Ekmeledden Ihsanoglu. The OIC is the Organisation of Islamic Conference which became the Organisation of Islamic Council in 2011. The OIC is a radical Islamist organisation which seeks to impose sharia law on the West. In 2013 he wrote:
"Bismillah. I have been working on the report for the "Islam & Science – The Big Questions" (of science and Islamic theology) Task Force that I convened in Istanbul in February 2015, chaired by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, by the grace of God. The Task Force report will be published in a few weeks, God-willing." https://unity1.wordpress.com/
MIM: Usama Hasan's taqiyya regarding jihad is both dangerous and an insult to non Muslim's intelligence. One need only to pick up a copy of the Quran to see he is lying. He and the other members of the Muslim Reform Movement are using a touchy feely approach to lie to Kuffar, thanking them for their "love and compassion" and presenting this perverted version of jihad "with love". The whitewashing of the concept of jihad ends with a call for "a jihad for universal human rights" an oxymoron in Islam.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------August 2 at 11:49am · Phoenix, AZ ·
Dear Muslim Reform Movement supporters and followers,
We welcome you to our ongoing journey and dialogue. Each month we will review key components of our Declaration – terms and concepts- that have long been debated, misinterpreted or falsely defined. We clarify them here and now with religious justification, and reason, to limit and eventually end their inhuman application. We encourage respectful reasoned discussion and debate.
While all of our founders agree on the declaration we may obviously disagree on various details, and for this reason we will use this forum to help express our diversity. Each month one of our leaders will begin the conversation representing his/her own take on the idea/terminology and then the rest of us and you will hopefully engage on areas of agreement, disagreement, hope and concern.
Thank you for your love and compassion.
We will prevail. We must for the sake of our shared humanity.
This month's term: JIHAD
Ten Truths about Jihad
Imam Dr. Usama Hasan
With the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate
1. THE ESSENTIAL QUR'ANIC TEACHING ABOUT JIHAD IS THAT IT IS A LIFELONG, NONVIOLENT STRUGGLE FOR GOODNESS, JUSTICE AND TRUTH AGAINST EVIL, INJUSTICE AND FALSEHOOD
The essential Qur'anic teaching about Jihad is that it is a non-violent struggle for goodness of all kinds, and against evil of all types. This is clear from the following Meccan verses of the Qur'an: "Struggle in God, as the struggle (jihad) deserves ..." (Pilgrimage 22:78); and "Obey not the concealers (of truth), and struggle against them with it (the Qur'an): a great struggle (jihad)." (The Criterion 25:52)
2. DURING HIS 13 YEARS' MISSION IN MECCA, THE PROPHET AND HIS FOLLOWERS WERE SUBJECTED TO PERSECUTION, BUT WERE ORDERED TO REMAIN PATIENT & NONVIOLENT
This is clear from verses such as the following:
"Withhold your hands (from violence in self-defence): establish prayer and give in charity" (Women 4:77) Note that during this time, the Prophet's followers were persecuted, tortured and killed. He himself was the subject of assassination attempts and plots (Spoils of War 8:30), but the Muslim response remained peaceful and nonviolent.
3. DURING THE PROPHET'S 10-YEAR MISSION IN MEDINA, MILITARY JIHAD IN SELF-DEFENCE WAS EVENTUALLY PERMITTED
This is clear from Medinan verses such as the following:
"Permission has been given to those who were fought (to fight back), because they have been oppressed ... those who were unjustly expelled from their homes, only for saying: 'Our Lord is God'." (Pilgrimage 22:39-40)
"Fight, in the way of God, those who fight you, and transgress not: truly, God does not love transgressors." (The Heifer 2:190)
4. MILITARY JIHAD MAY ONLY BE DECLARED BY A LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
An example of such an authority was the Prophet Muhammad, undisputed leader of the city-state of Medina - see the Medina Charter, an agreement between the Prophet and the non-Muslim, largely Jewish, tribes of Medina, for clauses relating to mutual defence of Medina against external aggression.
Several Qur'anic verses that speak of fighting and concluding peace are addressed in the singular to the Prophet, e.g. Women 4:84 and Spoils of War 8:61. This is because only he, as the legitimate ruler of the city-state of Medina, had the authority to declare a state of war or peace.
Throughout the centuries of Islamic jurisprudence on warfare ethics, the jurists have agreed that only a legitimate authority can declare a state of war or military jihad. In modern times, this means that only legitimate states have the authority to declare a state of war or military jihad: vigilante or non-state actors such as terrorist groups have no Islamic authority whatsoever to issue a call to arms in the name of jihad. This is why we stated in the Muslim Reform Movement Declaration that "we reject violent jihad."
5. EVEN THE MOST APPARENTLY-BELLIGERENT VERSES ABOUT JIHAD ARE IN SELF-DEFENCE
For example, the eighth and ninth surahs or chapters of the Qur'an, al-Anfal (Spoils of War) and al-Tawbah (Repentance):
In Surah al-Anfal, the command to "Prepare against them your strength to the utmost ..." is followed by the exhortation to accept overtures of peace from the enemy: "If they incline towards peace, then also incline towards it, and trust in God." (Spoils of War 8:60-61)
Thus, the preparation of utmost strength is largely a deterrent, to encourage any enemies to sue for peace.
In Surah al-Tawbah, the command to "Fight them: God will punish them at your hands ..." was preceded by the cause: "They violated their oaths and ... attacked you first." (Repentance, 9:12-15)
Thus, as in The Heifer 2:190 and Pilgrimage 22:39, fighting was ordered in self-defence. Note that in the Medinan era, the pagan, polytheistic Meccan armies attacked the Muslims in Medina several times, aiming to wipe the latter out, e.g. at the Battles of Uhud and the Trench. Thus, the Prophet and the Muslims in Medina were utterly justified in waging military jihad to protect themselves. The numerous Qur'anic verses dealing with military jihad against the Meccan polytheists must be understood in this context.
Finally, the verse of jizya (Repentance 9:29) was revealed when the Byzantines and their allies under Emperor Heraclius threatened the northern regions of Islamic Arabia from Syria, resulting in the Tabuk expedition that ended without any fighting.
The jizya protection- and poll-tax, the name itself deriving from Persian, was always a political tax, not religious. This is evident in the fact that some Islamic jurists later advised Muslims under the Reconquista in Andalusia to pay jizya to their Christian conquerors. Furthermore, the Ottoman Caliph abolished the jizya and the associated category of dhimma in the mid-19th century CE, with the agreement of his most senior Islamic scholars, recognising that it was no longer relevant to the modern world of the time.
Thus, although early Muslim armies did take part in expansionist campaigns, at least partly motivated by the war stratagem that 'Offence is the best form of defence', Muslim authorities, both political and religious, have recognised for at least two centuries that this kind of military jihad has no place in the modern world that is governed by treaties, peace agreements and international collaboration.
6. MILITARY JIHAD WAS ALSO LEGISLATED TO PROTECT & PROMOTE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
This is clear from the following Qur'anic verse:
"Permission has been given to those who were fought (to fight back), because they have been oppressed ... those who were unjustly expelled from their homes, only for saying: 'Our Lord is God'.
And were God not to check some people by means of others, then monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, where God's name is mentioned often, would surely be demolished." (Pilgrimage 22:39-40)
Thus, military Jihad was also legislated to protect the religious freedom of Muslims, Jews and Christians, according to the explicit text of the Qur'an. Muhammad bin Qasim, the 8th-century CE Muslim commander who first brought Islam to India, extended this religious protection to Zoroastrian and Hindu temples.
Note that this religious protection also originally extended to the idolatrous polytheists of Mecca and Medina - the latter were included in the Medina Charter, and both were covered by the Qur'anic dictum, "To you, your religion: to me, my religion." (The Concealers of Truth, 109:6) It was only when the Meccan polytheists refused to be peaceful and violently persecuted the Muslims, attempting genocide, that they were fought. Even then, the Hudaybiya peace treaty was concluded with them later.
7. MILITARY JIHAD WAS ALWAYS CONDITIONED BY STRONG ETHICAL RESTRICTIONS
Numerous hadiths speak of the obligation of avoiding the killing of women, children, old people, peasants, monks and others in war - in the 7th-century CE, these were advanced, civilised teachings. Further hadiths forbid the chopping down of trees, burning of orchards or poisoning wells or other water supplies as part of war tactics. These teachings may be seen as Islamic forerunners of modern warfare ethics, such as the Geneva Conventions, that are also Islamic in spirit and must be seen as binding upon Muslims worldwide.
The 12th-13th century CE Andalusian philosopher and jurist, Ibn Rushd (Averroes), in his short 'Book of Jihad', part of his Bidayat al-Mujtahid (available in English as 'The Distinguished Jurist's Primer'), discusses ten issues related to the philosophy and ethics of war or military jihad. Thus, Islam has a long tradition of warfare ethics.
8. TO REITERATE, JIHAD IS A STRUGGLE FOR GOOD AGAINST EVIL
This may take many forms: jihad bil-mal is charitable spending; jihad bil-lisan is speaking truth or goodness against evil and injustice. Thus, all forms of social, intellectual and political struggle with noble aims are a type of jihad, in traditional Islamic terminology. An example of this is the hadith or Prophet's teaching, "The best jihad is to speak a word of truth before a tyrant ruler."
However, this teaching does not privilege so-called 'Islamic political parties' or Islamist groups that wrongly claim to monopolise interpretations of Islam in the social and political realms.
Jihad is a universal struggle for good against evil. The verse, "Struggle in God, as the struggle (jihad) deserves ..." (Pilgrimage 22:78) also includes the teachings, "... This is the path of your father Abraham ... Establish prayer, give charity and hold to God: He is your Protector ..."
9. THE OUTER JIHAD IS ALWAYS UNDERPINNED BY INNER JIHAD
Inner jihad or jihad al-nafs (struggle against the self's base desires) has always been understood as a prerequisite for taking part in the outer jihad, or struggle for goodness and truth in the world.
This is reflected in the Qur'anic promise of heaven to whoever fears standing before God and "forbids their self from base desires" (The Snatchers 79:40-41). Furthermore, a hadith states, "The true mujahid (holy warrior) is the one who struggles against their own self for the sake of God."
Ibrahim bin Abi Ablah, an early ascetic of Islam, once remarked after a military expedition, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad," i.e. from the lesser, military jihad to the greater jihad of lifelong struggle against evil.
This teaching was also attributed to the Prophet himself and widely favoured by the Sufis, who were keen to preserve the spiritual dimensions of Islam during the early centuries of astonishing Islamic military conquests and worldly success.
10. JIHAD TODAY
As shown above, Islamic teachings about jihad are essentially spiritual and non-violent. All charitable efforts or struggles by Muslims today for goodness, truth and justice against evil and injustice may be termed jihad. For example, the Prophet termed "struggling to help widows and orphans" and "struggling to serve elderly parents" as types of jihad.
Armed or military jihad is the strict preserve of legitimate authority such as modern nation-states engaging in ethical warfare: this is why the Muslim Reform Movement firmly rejects 'violent jihad' carried out by non-state actors or vigilante groups such as terrorist organisations.
What we really need is a jihad for universal human rights, dignity, equality, peace and justice, tempered by the mercy and compassion that are the essential spirit of Islam and the Qur'an.
Imam Dr Usama Hasan