Home      |      Weblog      |      Articles      |      Satire      |      Links      |      About      |      Contact


Militant Islam Monitor > Weblog > Muslim Public Affairs Council aligns with CAIR - radical Islamist groups are hosted at 5 government Iftar dinners

Muslim Public Affairs Council aligns with CAIR - radical Islamist groups are hosted at 5 government Iftar dinners

November 20, 2005

MPAC National Separated at birth but joined in the goal of a United States of Allah : Muslim Public Affairs Council Director Ahmed Younis and The Council of American Islamic Relations Ahmed Rehab.

CAIR further reiterates the goal of making Islam the dominant religion in America by joining forces with other groups and explains that:

"...Our partnerships are not limited to Muslim organizations and institutions. The American Muslim identity is a unique and integral part of the whole that is America..."

At a university event Younis, whose group said Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks, stated that "Adolf Eichmann was himself a Jew, so in fact Jews killed themselves in the Holocaust.

MIM: In 2005 CAIR's Ahmed Rehab, and Dina Rehab, CAIR's outreach coordinator , visited a church to lecture about Islam.

Dina Rehab announced that "No church is off our radar screen" .

(Ahmed) Rehab the guest speaker, started off by asking the women to rate their knowledge of Islam from one to ten; then he asked those who rated themselves higher than a five to raise their hand. No hands went up


"It's ok," Rehab smiled, "that justifies my coming here and makes my trip all the more worthwhile."
---------------------------------------

MIM: The war on terrorism is supposed to be given top priority by the US government,so it comes as a setback on the national security front to seet that the Muslim Public Affairs Council is gloating on their website about MPAC's being invited to five government sponsored Iftar dinners for Ramadan. The first question of course being why any government organisations are awarding such deference to Muslims, which is acorded to no other religious group. The second question is that how MPAC has been relegated to 'salon fahig' organisation despite the fact that one of their leaders sta blamed Israel for the 9/11 attacks , and the claims of MPAC national director Ahmed Younis that " Adolf Eichmann was himself a Jew, so in fact Jews killed themselves in the Holocaust."

In additiion MPAC's concerted campaign to undermine the war on terrorism included holding an 'countering policital and religous extremism", MPAC equated counter terrorism expert Steven Emerson with Osama Bin Laden, calling the former a threat to national security in a 48 page booklet entitled "Counter productive counter terrorism". This blatant attempt to subvert America's war on terrorism, and MPAC's 'merging' with the Saudi funded Council on American Islamic Relations, has not stopped US and European governments from feting both groups. For it's part, MPAC announced on their website that:

"...During this blessed month of Ramadan, the Muslim Public Affairs Council has participated in iftar dinners sponsored by a number of U.S. government agencies. The events act not only to formally recognize the presence and contribution of the American Muslim community, but also provide a forum in which issues of common concern can be addressed..."

MPAC head Marayati's 9/11 statement to a Los Angles radio showed the true face of MPAC.

"If we're going to look at suspects we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts attention from what's happening in the Palestinian territories so that they can go on with their aggression and occupation and apartheid policies.",

http://www.mpac.org/home_article_display.aspx?ITEM=833

MPAC Attends Five Government Hosted Iftars During Ramadan
Thursday, October 27, 2005

During this blessed month of Ramadan, the Muslim Public Affairs Council has participated in iftar dinners sponsored by a number of U.S. government agencies. The events act not only to formally recognize the presence and contribution of the American Muslim community, but also provide a forum in which issues of common concern can be addressed.


MPAC ATTENDS IFTARS AT THE WHITE HOUSE, STATE DEPT, TREASURY DEPT, USAID, AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Washington, DC - MPAC leadership attended iftars hosted by the Department of Treasury, the State Department, the White House, the US Agency for International Development, and the European Union. At each event, they raised pressing concerns from the community.

These events have significant symbolism for the perceived place of Muslims and their faith within American culture and tradition. They also serve to compliment the rich substantive exchange between MPAC and the United States government in its various departments and bureaus. MPAC is encouraged by the past year and continues to urge President Bush to lead his cabinet and their respective departments on a road that is inclusive of Muslims at the policy-making level.

US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

On October 26, the Department of Treasury's Deputy Secretary Robert Kimmit hosted an iftar dinner with a group of community leaders to celebrate the month of Ramadan. Muslim community representatives in attendance were MPAC National Director Ahmed Younis, MPAC Foundation Board Member Dr. Hassan Ibrahim, and Secretary General of the Islamic Society of North America Dr. Sayyid M. Syeed.

STATE DEPARTMENT

On October 25, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice hosted leaders of the American Muslim and diplomatic community. Other dignitaries in attendance included Dina Powell, Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs; Dr. Akbar Ahmed, Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at the American University; Dr. Sulayman Nyang, Professor of African Studies at Howard University; Imam Mohamed Magid, Executive Director of All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS); Dr. Sayyid M. Syeed, Secretary General of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); Dr. James J. Zogby, President of the Arab American Institute (AAI); and Nihad Awad, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). National Director Ahmed Younis attended on behalf of MPAC.

"Secretary Rice's comments reinforced our nation's dedication to the maintenance of a robust pluralism and the everlasting struggle to adhere to the principles of the founders," said MPAC National Director Ahmed Younis.

In her remarks, Secretary Rice said:

"We in America know the benevolence that is at the heart of Islam. We've seen it in many ways. And most recently, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Muslim nations extended some of the most generous offers of support that we received. And after the recent earthquake in South Asia, the entire world watched as thousands of Muslims, deep in the observance of Ramadan, led the relief effort without breaking their fast.

"We in America also know that Muslims, like people of all faiths and people of no faith at all, possess certain basic rights that arise from our equal human dignity. Among these are the right to live without oppression, the right to worship without persecution, and the right to think and speak and assemble without wrongful retribution."

US AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID)

On October 20, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) hosted the third annual USAID Iftar at the USAID headquarters in Washington, D.C. Hosted by USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios, the event was attended by several members of the diplomatic community, Arab American non-profit organizations, as well as leaders in the Muslim American community, and officials from USAID and the Department of State.

Imam Hisham Husainy of the Kerbala Center in Detroit announced the breaking of the fast and gave a few remarks on peace, co-existence and extending our helping hand to the less fortunate. Administrator Natsios welcomed all the guests, and commented on the formation and history of the Agency and its efforts to reach out in the Muslim world. "Approximately 50% of the total U.S. foreign aid goes to the Muslim world," he said.

Zuleqa Husain, MPAC's DC Operations Liaison was in attendance along with Ambassador Jehangir Keramat from Pakistan, Ambassador Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury from Bangladesh, and Deputy Chief of the Mission of Indonesia Andri Hadi.

THE WHITE HOUSE

On October 17, President Bush hosted leaders of the Diplomatic Corps, members of the American Muslim community and the ambassadors from the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) for the 5th Annual Iftar dinner at the White House.

"We have great respect for the commitment that all Muslims make to faith, family, and education," President Bush said. "We must also firmly oppose all who commit evil in God's name. I am grateful to the Muslim nations that have joined our coalition in the war on terror -- including many nations that have been victims of terror themselves? I appreciate those of you here who have joined these scholars in rejecting violent extremists. And I believe the time has come for all responsible Islamic leaders to denounce an ideology that exploits Islam for political ends, and defiles your noble faith."

The President also announced at the iftar that "...for the first time in our nation's history, we have added a Koran to the White House Library."

Dr. Yahya Basha, board member of MPAC, attended the White House Iftar and discussed with the President the need for the formation of a Presidential task force to coordinate relief efforts between governmental and non-governmental humanitarian groups in response to the South Asia earthquake, and the need for developing partnerships with Muslim communities to raise the level of civic engagement of Muslim American youth, as part of MPAC's on-going Muslim American Project.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

On October 6, European Ambassador John Bruton, Head of the Delegation of the European Commission to the United States, and his wife Mrs. Finola Bruton held an iftar dinner in Washington, DC.

MPAC National Director Ahmed Younis, and Board Members Dr. Yahya Basha and Dr. Hassan Ibrahim attended the event. Sir Charles Clarke, Home Secretary of the United Kingdom, also attended on behalf of the European Union. U.S. government officials also in attendance as guests included Secretary Michael Chertoff of the Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Distinguished leaders of the Muslim American community in attendance included M.J. Khan, Houston City Councilman; Dr. Akbar Ahmed, Ibn Kaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University; Imam Mohammed Magid of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS); and Farhana Khera, Executive Director of the National Association of Muslim Lawyers (NAML).

Attorney General Gonzales expressed his interest in understanding the "realities of this community," saying that he intends on engaging with the Muslim American community personally to further understand its concerns. Gonzales expressed his appreciation for the day-long talks he and Secretary Chertoff had with their European counterparts.

"One of the great promises of this nation and all freedom-loving countries is that the liberties and rights we hold dear are available to every citizen regardless of race, creed or religion," said Secretary Chertoff. "The Department of Homeland Security will continue to work closely with the Muslim community to ensure that the reality they encounter is consistent with that promise."

MPAC National Director Ahmed Younis stressed to Attorney General Gonzales and Secretary Chertoff the need to emulate the work of Home Secretary Clarke in forming a number of Councils under their auspices to begin to deal with many of these important issues in an organized and comprehensive manner.

[CONTACT: Edina Lekovic, 213-383-3443, communications@mpac.org]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

MPAC Condemns Terror by Robert Spencer

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18780

Immediately after the 7/7 London bombings, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) did just what the Western world has been longing for Muslims to do ever since 9/11: it issued an unequivocal condemnation of the bombers and of terrorism in general. "Any individual or group that claims that these heinous actions serve as a redress for legitimate grievances," MPAC thundered, "is dreadfully mistaken. MPAC condemns the exploitation of people and issues, regardless of the perpetrators and their justifications. This assault is unmistakably an act of terrorism, an attack against humanity."

But in fact, this was nothing new for MPAC. In a July 12, 2005 statement, the organization declared: "MPAC has never supported any organizations that support or utilize violence – i.e. terrorism, suicide bombings, beheadings, etc. To do so would be antithetical to the values of sanctity of human life, justice, mercy, and equality for all that make up MPAC's vision statement. In fact, MPAC officials have frequently been on record unequivocally condemning all varieties of violence committed in the name of religion."

Such words are welcome, but ultimately hollow without deeds to back them up. And of course, MPAC would say it is doing just that: for some time, the group has been touting its new "National Anti-Terrorism Campaign" (NATC), garnering uncritical publicity in the media and even praise from government officials. The Campaign proclaims: "It is our duty as American Muslims to protect our country and to contribute to its betterment." MPAC calls for "religious awareness and education to create a strong Islamic environment that does not allow terrorism to be considered as a form of struggle in Islam. The different acceptable forms of struggle in Islam are part of the noble concept of jihad. This doesn't tolerate hurting civilians, suicidal destruction of human life or inflicting harm on non-combatants."

That sounds great, but how actually effective the NATC is in combating terrorism is an open question. Most notably, it doesn't seem to have anything to say about schools of Islamic thought that allow for the killing of non-combatants if they are perceived as aiding the war effort of the enemies of Islam (cf. Mawardi, al-Akham as-Sultaniyyah, 4.2; 'Umdat al-Salik o9.10). The day after the London bombings, Dr. Hani Al-Siba'i, director of the Al-Maqreze Centre for Historical Studies in London, said this on Al-Jazeera, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute: "The term ‘civilians' does not exist in Islamic religious law….I'm familiar with religious law. There is no such term as ‘civilians' in the modern Western sense. People are either of Dar Al-Harb [House of War] or not." If MPAC really hopes to have an impact against this kind of thinking among Muslims, it must confront and refute it on Islamic grounds. The NATC does not seem to address this need.

Likewise, MPAC's rejection of "suicidal destruction of human life" assumes what it has to establish: that suicide bombing should indeed be classified as suicide and thus considered to be forbidden in Islamic law. This is a much-disputed point. The internationally renowned and influential Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi has said that such bombers are not suicidal: "It's not suicide, it is martyrdom in the name of God, Islamic theologians and jurisprudents have debated this issue. Referring to it as a form of jihad, under the title of jeopardising the life of the mujahideen. It is allowed to jeopardise your soul and cross the path of the enemy and be killed." How would MPAC propose to disabuse Muslims of such ideas? No hint is forthcoming from the NATC.

The Campaign contains some positive elements: MPAC declares that its intention is to "send a clear message to our fellow citizens that terrorism is not a part of our faith, and that we stand shoulder-to-shoulder with them against terrorism and religious extremism." To this end, it calls on mosques to "have a relationship that involves public meetings with the FBI's regional office and local law enforcement" and recommends arrangement of programs "in cooperation with local law enforcement agencies to educate and train the community on how to really detect criminal activities."

However, the concern here seems to be less on rooting out jihadists from within American Muslim communities than on protecting Muslims from uncomfortable attention from law enforcement. This question appears: in a Frequently Asked Questions section, "By engaging the FBI and law enforcement, aren't we collaborating with the very agencies trampling our civil rights?" The response: "Actually, it has been MPAC's experience that working with local FBI field offices helps protect our civil liberties….Engagement of local law enforcement and local FBI field offices is absolutely critical in protecting our civil liberties. It counters the basic human weakness to make assumptions about a person/community which they have never been in contact with before." Answering that question might have been a good opportunity to for MPAC to tell American Muslims that the best way they could quell suspicions about their loyalties would be to cooperate fully and openly with anti-terror investigations -- that the most effective way to protect their civil liberties would be to demonstrate with decisive action their commitment to protecting and defending the safety of the United States and stability of its Constitutional government. But instead, in the next answer MPAC denied any intention to call on American Muslims to "‘spy' on each other": "Absolutely not. The thought is anathema to our purpose as an organization." But that amounts to an admission that MPAC is not asking Muslims to report on suspicious activity in American mosques. How effective, then, can their anti-terror campaign be?

The rest of MPAC's recommendations are in the same vein, appearing to be more concerned about misbehavior by non-Muslim law enforcement officials in mosques than about the possibility of terrorist activity in those mosques. Its focus is misplaced in other ways as well. It recommends, for example, that "All activities within the mosque and Islamic centers should be authorized by legitimate, acknowledged leadership…" That sounds great until one realizes that if a mosque is involved in or sympathetic to terrorist activity, this is not likely because unauthorized persons have somehow wormed their way in among the moderate community. It is much more likely that the jihadist sentiments will come from the mosque leadership — as per the Naqshbandi Sufi leader Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani's statement that eighty percent of American mosques were controlled by extremists. MPAC has dismissed Kabbani's words as "an offhand remark in 1998…in some obscure presentation."

But in fact there was nothing offhand or obscure about what Kabbani said, and he didn't say it in 1998. Kabbani said it in a State Department Open Forum on January 7, 1999: "The most dangerous thing that is going on now in these mosques," he declared, "that has been sent upon these mosques around the United States – like churches they were established by different organizations and that is ok – but the problem with our communities is the extremist ideology. Because they are very active they took over the mosques; and we can say that they took over more than 80% of the mosques that have been established in the US. And there are more than 3000 mosques in the US. So it means that the methodology or ideology of extremist has been spread to 80% of the Muslim population, but not all of them agree with it."

Offhand? Kabbani based his statement on personal investigation of 114 American mosques, and never retracted his words, despite enormous pressure from American Muslim advocacy groups. In October 2001 the New York Times reported: "Sheik Kabbani said that he stood by his claim in his State Department speech that 80 percent of American mosques had been taken over by extremists, because of the 114 mosques he first visited in the United States, ‘Ninety of them were mostly exposed, and I say exposed, to extreme or radical ideology,' based on their speeches, books and board members."

But the most notorious example of MPAC's questionable focus is its war on terrorism expert Steve Emerson. At a conference on "Countering Religious & Political Extremism" held on December 18, 2004 (and later televised on C-Span), it distributed a 48-page booklet attacking not bin Laden, or Zawahiri, or Zarqawi, but Emerson. Entitled "Counterproductive Counterterrorism," the booklet sought to frame opposition to Emerson as a national security issue: "In order to enhance the security of our country, it is necessary to expose the vocal minority of Americans who continue to exploit the tragedy of September 11 to advance their pre-existing anti-Muslim agenda." MPAC excoriates Emerson for asserting that "political correctness enforced by American Muslim groups has limited the public's knowledge about the spread of radical Islam in the U.S.," but their anti-Emerson report attempts to do just that by impugning Emerson's motives, competence, and good will.

In the NATC FAQ, in an appalling display of moral myopia, MPAC even implies that Emerson and others are equivalent to Islamic terrorists: the question "Why does this campaign focus just on Muslims? Why not extremists amongst Christians and Jews?" gets this answer: "Without doubt Christian extremists such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and Franklin Graham or Jewish extremists such as Daniel Pipes and Steve Emerson need to be held accountable for their falsehoods and distortions. But let's face it, if another terrorist attack occurs Christians and Jews will not be the ones rounded up or have their civil liberties effected."

Let's face it indeed. Muslims, rather than Christians and Jews, may be "rounded up" not just by accident, or because of ingrained societal patterns of discrimination, but because they will be most likely be the ones who commit a terrorist attack. If Falwell or Pipes or Emerson were beheading and blowing people up in the name of their religion, this equation of "extremists" might be justified. But in reality it is a ghastly bit of character assassination.

In a similar attack of moral confusion, MPAC joined the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other groups on May 20, 2004 in signing a "Joint Muslims/Arab-American Statement on Israel Violence in Gaza." The organizations echoed some of the most virulent rhetoric that jihadists employ in their efforts against Israel, condemning "Israel's recent indiscriminate killings of innocent Palestinians, including many children" without mentioning the targeting by Palestinian suicide bombers of Israeli citizens on buses and in restaurants, or the Israeli government's care not to target civilians.

But such extreme rhetoric is nothing new for MPAC either. Most notoriously, on the afternoon of September 11, 2001, MPAC's Salam al-Maryati added fuel to the wildest, most paranoid conspiracy theories on a Los Angeles radio show: "If we're going to look at suspects we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts attention from what's happening in the Palestinian territories so that they can go on with their aggression and occupation and apartheid policies." Daniel Pipes recounts a "February 1996 incident when a Palestinian named Muhammad Hamida shouted the fundamentalist war cry, Allahu Akbar (Allah is Great), as he drove his car intentionally into a crowded bus stop in Jerusalem, killing one Israeli and injuring 23 others. Before he could escape or hurt anyone else, Hamida was shot dead. Commenting on the affair, Mr. Al-Marayati said not a word about Hamida's murderous rampage but instead focused on Hamida's death, which he called ‘a provocative act,' and demanded the extradition of his executors to America ‘to be tried in a U.S. court' on terrorism charges."

Continuing in this anti-Israel and anti-Semitic vein, Ahmed Younis, MPAC's national director, said in March 2005, according to Pipes, "that Adolf Eichmann was himself a Jew, so in fact Jews killed themselves in the Holocaust."

That is by no means all. Long before Brian Williams did it, MPAC's Salam Al-Maryati in 1996 equated jihad terrorists with the Founding Fathers: "Most Islamic movements have been branded as terrorists as a result of the rising extremism from a handful of militants. American freedom fighters hundreds of years ago were also regarded as terrorists by the British." Two years later, MPAC Senior Advisor Maher Hathout told the National Press Club that the terrorist group "Hezbollah is fighting for freedom...This is legitimate." That same year, when the U.S. struck al-Qaeda sites in Afghanistan and Sudan, Hathout was furious: "Our country," he sputtered, "is committing an act of terrorism. What we did is illegal, immoral, unhuman, unacceptable, stupid and un-American."

Such statements cast a shadow over all of MPAC's activities. It has called for reform of the Patriot Act, insisting that "the goal of the reformers of the Patriot Act, including MPAC, is to protect our nation while securing its character and integrity so as to not let our enemies swerve us from our way of life." But what with MPAC's officials characterizing anti-terror efforts as "terrorism" and anti-terror advocates as "extremists," the organization has provoked legitimate questions about just how committed it really is to protecting our nation.

It doesn't have to be this way. MPAC could clear up all these questions and ambiguities with forthright anti-terror actions to back up its words. Let it publish a plan for combating inflammatory anti-American, anti-Jewish, and anti-Christian rhetoric in American mosques. Let it develop a plan to blunt the force of the jihadist interpretation of the Qur'an and Islamic tradition among Muslims. If it directed its efforts to these and other genuine anti-terror efforts, the ringing words it issued in the wake of the London bombings would not ring hollow.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

CAIR and MPAC have teamed up to further their mutual agenda of making Islam the dominant religion in the United States. This recent event which was organised by both groups leaves no secret as to their agenda which is to make Muslim identity America's Future.

"...Our partnerships are not limited to Muslim organizations and institutions. The American Muslim identity is a unique and integral part of the whole that is America..." CAIR's homepage http://www.cairchicago.org/ourpartners.php

Muslim American Identity: Present and Future
November 19, 2005


undefined

WHAT - "Muslim American Identity: Present and Future" Conference

1st session 1-230. "Defining Muslim American Identity" Dr Hathout and Inamul Haq.

2nd session 3-430. "Muslim American identity on the campus." Edina Lekovic, Ahmed Younis and Sufyan Sohel. (Sufyan was student body President at Tulane and is a good speaker.) Aliya Haque will moderate.

3rd session 5-630. "Effective Political Engagement." Salam al-Maryati, Ahmed Rehab and a speaker to be named later.

Dinner and keynote 7-9 PM. I will recap ISPI objectives, previous projects and future plans. Dr. Mahfuz Haque will recognize Prof Asad Husain for life time achievement. Prof Nyang will give his keynote and the speakers at the earlier sessions will be on the stage to answer questions and comment if they so wish.

WHERE - Illinois Benedictine University in Lisle, Illinois.

WHEN - November 19, 2005 @ 7-9 PM

Note: Sunday invitation only Brunch at the Holiday Inn 9-12. Speakers from the previous day and a few select invitees will debate the draft of a position paper on "Preserving and enhancing Muslim American identity."


Printer-friendly version   Email this item to a friend