This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3492
June 11, 2008
The Interfaith Youth Core directed by Eboo Patel claims its aim is to "promote mutual respect and pluralism among young people". Then why did self proclaimed interfaith guru (viewed by many as a moderate messiah) Eboo Patel emcee at the 2007 annual event of The Council on American Islamic Relations a Saudi funded front group for Hamas and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holyland Foundation Hamas funding trial? CAIR is also a defendant in a 9/11 terrorism lawsuit which states that:
86. Council on American Islamic Relations and CAIR Canada (collectively, CAIR), have aided, abetted, and materially sponsored and al Qaeda and international terrorism. CAIR is an outgrowth of the Hamas front group the Islamic Association of Palestine. The FBI's former associate director in charge of Investigative and Counter-Intelligence Operations described the Islamic Association of Palestine as an organization that has directly supported Hamas military goals and is a front organization for Hamas that engages in propaganda for Islamic militants. It has produced videotapes that are very hate-filled, full of vehement propaganda. It is an organization that has supported direct confrontation.
87. CAIR and CAIR-Canada have, since their inception, been part of the criminal conspiracy of radical Islamic terrorism. These organizations play a unique role in the terrorist network. They emanate from the notorious HAMAS terrorist organization and like so many of the terrorism facilitating charities named and indicted by the United States government they are engaged in fund raising under the guise of assisting humanitarian causes they are, in reality, a key player in international terrorism. The unique role played by CAIR and CAIR-Canada is to manipulate the legal systems of the United States and Canada in a manner that allows them to silence critics, analysts, commentators, media organizations, and government officials by leveling false charges of discrimination, libel, slander and defamation. In addition, both organizations have actively sought to hamper governmental anti-terrorism efforts by direct propaganda activities aimed at police, first-responders, and intelligence agencies through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name-calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies as possible so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities.
88. The role of CAIR and CAIR-Canada is to wage PSYOPS (psychological warfare) and disinformation activities on behalf of Whabbi-based [Wahhabi-based, DP] Islamic terrorists throughout North America. They are the intellectual "shock troops" of Islamic terrorism. In the years and months leading up to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 these organizations were very effective in helping to ensure that North American law enforcement and intelligence officials were sufficiently deaf, dumb, and blind to help pave the way for the attacks on the United States. The role played by these entities is an absolutely essential part of the mix of forces arrayed against the United States as they help soften-up targeted countries so as to facilitate and enhance the likelihood for a successful attack. http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2004/12/cair-named-as-a-defendant-in-911-terror.html
MIM: Patel doesn't blame radical Islamists for the 9/11 attacks, but for "spooking us".According to Patel terrorism is a "macabre magic intended to create the illusion of enemies everywhere."
"Religion writer Eboo Patel blames radical Islamists, and 9/11 for spooking us. "Terrorism," Patel wrote in Slate, "is more than heinous murder and guerrilla theater. It is a kind of macabre magic intended to create the illusion of enemies everywhere." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080604/cm_ucru/theeword
MIM: Patel plays both sides as the kumbaya moderate who runs a da'wa front under the guise of the Interfaith Youth Core. Interfaith is one of the most favored islamist tactics used to sugarcoat da'wa in order to lure non Muslims with a "more in common then we think" feel good dynamic to bring them into contact with Islam.His participation in the CAIR annual event shows he is a stealth Islamist .http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/2860
Dr. Eboo Patel, Founder and Executive Director of Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC)
CAIR-Chicago Executive Director (Ahmed Rehad with Iboo Patel) thanks staff, volunteers, supporters, and guests
Dr. Eboo Patel, event emcee and Executive Director of the Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC), greets Professor David Cole
MIM: IFYC director Iboo Patel counts radical Islamists Hamza Yusuf and Imam Zaid Shakir as his heroes.
"I talked about many of my Muslim heroes, scholars and activists like Shaykh Hamza Yusuf and Imam Zaid Shakir who have articulated visions of a world where people from different backgrounds come together in positive ways." http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/2008/03/the_spell_of_islamophobia.html
MIM:For anyone who needs clearer guidance about a "world where people from different backgrounds come together in positive ways"Imam Zaid Shakir has made a CD to clarify the difference between Jihad and misguided infidel concept of terrorism, which according to him does not exist in Islam.
"The enemies of Islam have linked [Jihad and Terrorism] together as far as we Muslims are concerned, by trying to make one synonymous with the other. They say that Jihad is irresponsible, random, senseless, violence, and terrorism is Jihad... The two are not synonymous; they can't be synonymous." -- Imam Zaid Shakir
Among the topics on the CD are:
-If the enemies of Islam attack Muslim civilians, can we attack non-Muslim civilians?
-What is the role of Muslims living amongst non-Muslims in the West?
-Jihad and terrorism, objective or subjective?
-What is the meaning of the word Jihad?
-Are we obliged to stay in the West?
-Who sanctions Jihad?
-World Trade Center Bombing!
-Should we vote?
-Hijra or Jihad?
MIM: Patel took part in a Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow conference sponsored by the ASMA Society and was on a panel which was moderated by Ahmed Younis of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.
The participants on the panel were Imam Rasheed, Precious Muhammed (Imam W.D. Muhammed's community), Behrooz Karjoovary (sufi), Samina Ali (shi'ia), Ahmed Nassef (progressive), Eboo Patel (Ismaili) and Asif Padela (Sunni). Imam Feisal was a respondent, and the panel was moderated by Ahmed Younis of the Muslim Public Affairs Council. http://www.asmasociety.org/religion/mlt_04retreat.html
MIM: Dr.Daniel Pipes summed up the intent of MPAC in his blog "MPAC's True Views"
"Its goal, we learn, is not to promote American interests but to "reflect the sentiment of Muslims worldwide" to Americans. Or, because Muslims have many different views and MPAC has one specific view, a more accurate formulation would be, "reflect the sentiment of Islamists worldwide" to Americans." http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2004/06/mpacs-true-views.html
MIM: An attendee at an IFYC conference wrote this in response to Patel's article "Smearing Muslims".
The Truth about Eboo Patel
I attended the Interfaith Youth Core conference in October of 2007. This conference was lead by Eboo Patel, and I was very excited about it. That is, until the political agenda became very clear. The conference centered on the superiority of Islam.
Every "interfaith" group or event carried this message. The keynote speaker was an Islamic convert, the interfaith prayer room was covered with Islamic prayer rugs, the keynote professors, one a Muslim convert, from the University of Chicago, claimed that there was no such thing or threat of "Islamofascism"
Eboo's opening address talked about the faith line. He created this idea that there were 2 types of people, interfaith and fundamentalists.
The implied message was that anyone who disagreed with Eboo and the conference agenda was a fundamentalist.
The last event I attended was a panel of Jewish activists that were facilitating meetings with leaders of Hamas. To portray any of these leaders as "spiritual" guides with only a hard-line approach, is simply lies. No one questioned any of these programs because they were under this facade of "interfaith."
I found the entire event very disturbing. The next month, I received Eboo's journal, "The Review of Faith and International Politics." Same agenda. The topics included the weakness of Zionism, convincing Evangelicals not to support Israel, and extremism in Judaism.
Patel even has blog post denouncing Ayaa Hirsi Ali as a money-grubbing capitalist! Well, at least she escaped the "infidel" charge. Quite a step up. Women are now not allowed to question Islam because they want to make money through the medium of selling books.
Daniel Pipes is a scholar who is highlighting the true activities of "moderates" to allow the public to decide. In the USA we have transparency, and if you want to call that a smear, I am truly questioning which side you are on, Mr. Patel. http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/2008/05/smearing_muslims/all_comments.html
MIM: According to Patel's Islamo centric world view it was Islam, not Americans and America, which were "deeply wounded" by 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden who "manipulated a very beautiful faith".
(Note: The author of this article stresses that although a devout Muslim Patel is deeply connected to Western culture. For more on this phenomenon see Dr.Daniel Pipes article below "The Western Mind of Radical Islam").
Of course, the devout young Muslim is saddened by the acts of terrorism that have deeply wounded his religion. He says Osama bin Laden is a coward and terrorist who has twisted a beautiful faith. The World Trade Center tragedy shocked him like everyone else. "I not only felt the loss of life and the pain that accompanies it — the fact it was perpetuated by people who call themselves Muslim — there's no grief that can describe how I feel."
Patel wishes he could talk to Osama bin Laden. "I would quote him a line from Rumi (a Sufi poet from the Middle Ages),‘It's not a Muslim you have become, it's an infidel.' I would ask his response to the Qur'an's injunction against the killing of civilians."
"The Qur'an encourages us to be merciful to the world," Patel quietly reflects. "Osama bin Laden has manipulated a very beautiful faith. There's no greater pain in the world to me. When people think of Muslims, I'd like for them to think of Rumi, not Osama bin Laden." http://www.consciouschoice.com/2002/cc1512/eboo1512.html
MIM: Patel uses pluralism as a synonym for Islam claiming as Islamists do that "it is the greatest opportunity for humanity."
VALENTE: Patel says he was deeply disturbed by the fact that the 9/11 terrorists were young men and that the suicide bombers in the Middle East and elsewhere are also young. He sees the world dividing along a "faith line" between what he calls pluralists and religious totalitarians.
Dr. PATEL: Only the smallest part of humanity wishes and acts upon the destruction of others. The pluralists are far larger. Those of us who believe in a world where we live together, we're far larger. The problem is we haven't made our case compelling across the world yet. What we pluralists have to do is say to the people standing on the faith line, particularly the young ones, no. Pluralism is the wish of the creator. It is the greatest opportunity for humanity.http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week1033/profile.html
MIM: The IFYC will be partnering with Tony Blair's new Blair Faith Foundation. According to an article by Patel:
The interfaith movement has lacked what the environmental movement got in 2000 – the presence of a serious global leader willing to engage a serious issue in a serious way: framing debate, galvanizing energy, generating resources, pointing to a major win and convincing the world that we can get there.
In two eloquent and important speeches - the first was a month ago in London and the second just last week in New York - Tony Blair articulated why he is committing a good part of the rest of his life to being that figure.
When I met with Blair in Chicago a few months ago, I was struck by the depth of his commitment to the issue, the scope of his vision and the concrete plans for his institution, the Tony Blair Faith Foundation....
Blair will teach a course on Faith and Globalization at Yale University. There are plans for educational material on the intersection of religious devotion and religious diversity, meant for distribution everywhere from corporations to teenagers (through web-based technologies). The Interfaith Youth Core is partnering with the Blair Faith Foundation (and Malaria No More) to bring faith communities together to end malaria in the next 5 – 10 years. http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/2008/06/the_tony_blair_faith_foundatio.html#more
MIM: The Interfaith Youth Core in their own words.
builds mutual respect and pluralism among young people from different religious traditions by empowering them to work together to serve others.
There are millions of religious young people in the world interacting with greater frequency. That interaction tends either toward conflict or cooperation. Where so many of these interactions tend towards conflict, the Interfaith Youth Core aims to introduce a new relationship, one that is about mutual respect and religious pluralism. Instead of focusing a dialogue on political or theological differences, we build relationships on the values that we share, such as hospitality and caring for the Earth, and how we can live out those values together to contribute to the betterment of our community.
The Interfaith Youth Core is creating these relationships across the world by inspiring, networking, and resourcing young people, who are the leaders of this movement. We provide young people and the institutions that support them with leadership training, project resources and a connection to a broader movement.
MIM: Kareem Irfan the head of the Council of Islamic Organisations of Greater Chicago is on the IYC board of directors. Irfan justified the beheadings of Paul Johnson and Nicholas Berg calling them "A primordial sense of retaliation and revenge". For more on Kareem Irfan and the CIOCG's terror funding connections see: http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/177
MIM: More on Kareem Irfan radical Islamist ties and da'wa agenda:
Bernardin Center advisory board member Kareem Irfan is the chairman of the Council for Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago [CIOGC] and a sits on the national board of the Islamic Society of North America. When asked in 2002 by CNN whether he regretted giving $5,000 dollars to Benevolence International Foundation, a charity directly connected to Bin Laden and Al Qaeda Irfan replied:
" I definitely do not regret it because I did it under the understanding that this was an outstanding institution." [source, http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110005269]
When questioned about the savage beheadings of Nicholas Berg and Paul Johnson in Iraq, rather than an outright condemnation, Irfan was muted at best:
"At bottom, though, Mr. Irfan believes that the beheadings simply demonstrate "a primordial sense of retaliation and revenge." [source, http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110005269]
In 2002 the CIOGC hosted a high-ranking delegation from the Saudi's Muslim World League [MWL], which has through its efforts established hundreds if not thousands of hard line Wahhabist mosques around the world. The MWL has been labeled by the Center for Security Policy's Alex Alexiev as, "the largest worldwide propaganda campaign ever mounted," and functions as a powerful agent in enforcing radical Islamic religious orthodoxy.
Board of Directors
Stephen Bell Kayla Cohen Tarek Elmasry Sunil Garg Dr. Tasneema Ghazi Dr. Anne C. Hallett, Esq. Rev. James R. Halstead Kareem M. Irfan
Ron Kinnamon Rabbi Andrea London Dr. Harold Richman Rev. Susan Thistlethwaite Rev. Laura Truax
MIM: Interfaith Youth Core Funders
(Note that convicted terrorist William aka Bill Ayers is on the staff of the Woods Fund. The Woods fund gave $40,000 to finance a project of Mona Khalidi, the wife of Islamist Rashid Khalidi.) http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=57231
Ansara Family Foundation
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Catherine Manley Gaylord Foundation
George Family Foundation
Henry Luce Foundation
Hunt Alternatives Fund
The Jenesis Group
McCormick Tribune Foundation
Nathan Cummings Foundation
Rauner Family Foundation
Rita & Harold Divine Foundation
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Shingleton Family Foundation
Walter & Elise Haas Fund
William J. Clinton Foundatio
Woods Fund of Chicago
MIM: Da'wa as interfaith:
Faith Inspired leaders from Mahatma Gandhi to Martin Luther King Jr. to the Dalai Lama built effective social change movements by encouraging diverse faith communities to come together on the common ground of helping others. The interfaith Youth Core carries on this legacy by bringing diverse young people of faith together to:
The Interfaith Youth Core is a youth-led, Chicago-based international, interfaith organization. In June of 1998, a group of religiously diverse young people from around the world found a common interest in integrating faith, diversity and social action. Since that first encounter, the Interfaith Youth Core has developed a strong program in Chicago while also taking a leading role in national and international youth work.
Our Chicago Action Program uses a shared values methodology to engage a diverse group of local faith communities in transformative interfaith social action projects.
Nationally, the IFYC focuses on catalyzing, resourcing and networking the emerging field of interfaith youth work.
Internationally, The IFYC has a history of developing and facilitating workshops and presentations:
MIM: Outreach is a euphemism for da'wa. Jenan Mohajir works as a volunteer at the Nawawi Foundation an Islamist institute which presents all of history from an Islamist perspective. Dr. Ingrid Mattson the president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) the largest Wahhabi funded da'wa organisation on the continent is on the board of directors of the Nawawi Foundation. http://www.nawawi.org/aboutus/board.html
Outreach Education and Training Associate
Jenan Mohajir has been extensively involved with the Muslim community through several grassroots initiatives in Chicago. She currently serves as the program associate for the Outreach Education & Training program at the Interfaith Youth Core, where her primary focus is on building relationships between the Muslim community and the Interfaith Youth Movement. Jenan also frequently speaks at various college campuses nationally regarding the importance of interfaith cooperation among young people, in addition to training youth leaders in organizing local interfaith youth service-learning events.
MIM: Makki was a board member of the Muslim Youth Center in Bridgeview and attends the Bridgeview Mosque Foundation. The Bridgeview Mosque is a known Hamas enclave and boasted at least one of the 9/11 hijackers as a congregant.
"...Sheik Jamal[Said] an imam at the mosque ... developed a national reputation and easily attracted prominent Muslim activists to Bridgeview. Abdullah Azzam, Osama bin Laden's spiritual mentor, visited the mosque in the mid-1980s as part of a national tour to recruit supporters for the U.S.-backed Afghan war against the Soviet Union. At least three Bridgeview men signed up. "[Jamal]raised money at one national Islamic conference by asking people to donate in the memory of a Palestinian suicide bomber..." http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/132
MIM: An article about Muslims in America reported on how they were given a tour of the mosque by Makki. After 9/11 a mob wanted to march on the Bridgeview Mosque. Instead of attributing it to anger over the mosque's known radical ties Makki blamed in on "jealously" "by lower class whites" [because] we live in nicer houses than they do".
Hind Makki, a petite student, proudly takes visitors on a tour of the mosque. ...Makki, 25, says that her dream job is to work for the State Department in Washington. She comes from a conservative family.On the day after Sept. 11, when the images of the fallen towers had barely taken hold in the collective consciousness, residents of a nearby trailer park had banded together and planned to attack the mosque. Church elders and the police managed to avert violence, but the group did inflict some minor damage.
"Jealousy was part of it," says Makki, "they were lower-class whites who couldn't stand the fact that we live in nicer houses than they do." http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,505573-2,00.html
In 2006 CAIR conducted an election volunteer training session at the Muslim Youth Center where Makki sat on the board. http://www.cairchicago.org/ournews.php?file=on_election_day_training10112006
Outreach Education and Training Associate
Hind received her B.A. in International Relations, focusing on Global Security and Diplomacy, in May 2001 from Brown University. She returned to her native southwest suburban Chicago, where she worked extensively within the Muslim community on matters regarding integration in American society, interfaith dialogue, education and youth leadership development. She was a board member of the Muslim Youth Center located in Bridgeview and currently sits on the board of the Southwest Interfaith Team (SWIFT), representing the Orland Park Prayer Center. She has been a mentor and team advisor of the Aqsa School Model UN team since 2004. Hind joined the IFYC as a Program Associate in the Outreach and Education Team in August 2007. http://ifyc.org/about_core/staff/oet
MIM: IFYC Partners
Search Institute is a leading innovator in discovering what children and adolescents need to become caring, healthy, and responsible adults. Drawing on extensive research, Search Institute brings solutions to pressing challenges in the lives of young people and their communities. The Inspired To Serve project is part of Search Institute's new Center for Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence.
|Youth Service America
Youth Service America sponsors a Global Youth Service Day in which youth participate in GYSD to address the needs of their local communities through service, to be recognized for their contributions, and to be a part of a global youth service movement. IFYC's Days of Interfaith Youth Service campaign is an official partner of YSA's National Global Youth Service Days.
|Learn and Serve America
The Inspired To Serve pilot project is made possible through a grant from Learn and Serve America. Learn and Serve America provides grants to schools, colleges, and nonprofit groups to support efforts to engage 1.5 million students each year in community service linked educational goals. Learn and Serve America is administered by the Corporation for National and Community Service, which also oversees Senior Corps and AmeriCorps.
|Jordan Interfaith Action
The Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC) has partnered with Jordan Interfaith Action (JIA) to coordinate an international interfaith youth exchange between Jordan and the United States. The partner organizations are training two highly talented groups of emerging faith leaders in Chicago and Jordan to be organizers and leaders of interfaith youth service and dialogue. The programs in both cities bring together students that represent the geographic, ethnic, religious and socio-economic diversity of the countries.
|America's Second Harvest
America's Second Harvest, the Nation's Food Bank Network is the largest domestic hunger-relief organization in the United States. It distributes food and grocery products through a nationwide network of certified affiliates, increases public awareness of domestic hunger, and advocates for policies that benefit America's hungry. Through their affiliates, America's Second Harvest delivers food and grocery products to approximately 50,000 local charitable hunger-relief organizations such as food pantries, soup kitchens, and women's shelters. Their services reach 23 million hungry people, including 9 million children and 2.5 million seniors.
|Habitat For Humanity
Habitat for Humanity International works to eliminate poverty housing and homelessness in the world. Habitat invites people of all backgrounds, races, and religions to build houses together in partnerships with families in need. They have built over 175,000 houses around the world and provided safe, decent, affordable shelter for over 900,000 people. Because Habitat is a grassroots organization, local affiliates across the world each oversee the work of building houses. Some local affiliates have chosen to offer interfaith builds, which intentionally bring together religiously diverse people and communities to build houses.
MIM: IFYC partners with CAIR,ISNA,MSA and other groups as part of the 'Dialogues for Peace' organisation revealing the radical Islamist core of interfaith.
Americans for Informed Democracy
Interfaith Youth Core
Religions for Peace U.S.A.
Islamic Society North America
Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding
Muslim Student Association National
Muhammad Ali Center
National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation
The Public Conversations Project
The Buxton Initiative
The Center for Muslim Christian Understanding
Council on American Islamic Relations
Our Voices Together
MIM: IFYC bulletins which includes a list of donors. Among them is terrorist Bill Ayers, Islamist apologist Scott Alexander and an official of the American Jewish Committee Emily Soloff.
|File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML|
2005-06 will see the Interfaith Youth Core tree growing taller and stronger, ...... Emily Soloff. Randall Styers. Yaser Tabbara. Pisaami Vogelaar ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
From www.danielpipes.org | Original article available at: www.danielpipes.org/article/273
The Western Mind of Radical Islam
by Daniel Pipes
[N.B.: The following reflects what the author submitted, and not exactly what was published. To obtain the precise text of what was printed, please check the original place of publication. Also, this version includes some post-1995 factual updates]
Fat'hi ash-Shiqaqi, a well-educated young Palestinian living in Damascus, recently boasted of his familiarity with European literature. He told an interviewer how he had read and enjoyed Shakespeare, Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, Sartre, and T.S. Eliot. He spoke of his particular passion for Sophocles' Oedipus Rex, a work he read ten times in English translation "and each time wept bitterly."1 Such acquaintance with world literature and such exquisite sensibility would not be of note except for two points - that Shiqaqi was, until his assassination in Malta in late 1995, a fundamentalist Muslim and that he headed Islamic Jihad, the arch-terrorist organization that has murdered dozens of Israelis over the last two years.
Shiqaqi's familiarity with things Western fits a common pattern. His successor as head of Islamic Jihad was Ramadan `Abdullah Shallah, a scholar who had previously lived in Britain and the United States for nine years and at the time of Shiqaqi's death taught political science at the University of South Florida in Tampa. Eyad Ismail, one of the World Trade Center bombers recently extradited from Jordan, also had a special affection for the United States. According to his brother, "He loved everything American from cowboy movies to hamburgers."2 His sister recalled his love of U.S. television and his saying "I want to live in America forever." The family, she commented, "always considered him a son of America."3 His mother confirmed that "he loves the United States."4
Islamist intellectuals are also very much at home in the West. Hasan at-Turabi, the effective ruler of Sudan, the man behind the notorious "ghost houses" and the brutal persecution of his country's large Christian minority, often flaunts his knowledge of the West, telling a French interviewer that most fundamentalist leaders, like himself, are "from the Christian, Western culture. We speak your languages."5 In a statement that sums up this whole outlook, a fundamentalist in Washington asserted, "I listen to Mozart; I read Shakespeare; I watch the Comedy Channel; and I also believe in the implementation of the Sharia [Islamic sacred law]."6
This pattern points to a paradox: the very intellectuals intent on marching the Muslim world back to the seventh century also excel in Western ways and seem very much to appreciate at least some of them. How does this happen? What does it indicate about their present strengths and future course?
Fundamentalists are Westernized
Fundamentalist leaders tend to be well acquainted with the West, having lived there, learned its languages, and studied its cultures. Turabi of the Sudan has advanced degrees from the University of London and the Sorbonne; he also spent a summer in the United States in 1961, touring the country on a U.S. taxpayer-financed program for foreign student leaders. Abbasi Madani, a leader of Algeria's Islamic Salvation Front (FIS), received a doctorate in education from the University of London. His Tunisian counterpart, Rashid al-Ghannushi, spent a year in France and since 1993 makes his home in Great Britain. Necmettin Erbakan, Turkey's leading militant politician and now its prime minister, studied in Germany. Mousa Mohamed Abu Marzook, the head of Hamas's political committee, has lived in the United States since 1980, has a doctorate degree in engineering from the University of Louisiana, and has been a permanent U.S. resident since 1990. In recent years he lived in northern Virginia with his wife and six children.7 He was arrested in 1995 at a New York airport on his way into the country to register his son in an American school.
Indeed, the experience of living in the West often turns indifferent Muslims into fundamentalists. Discussing Mehdi Bazargan, an Iranian engineer who spent the years 1928-35 in France, Hamid Dabashi dissects the process many Muslim students undergo:
Beginning with the conscious or unconscious, articulated or mute, premise that they ought to remain firmly attached to their Islamic consciousness, they begin to admire "The Western" achievements. . . . They recognize a heightened state of ideological self-awareness on the part of "The West" that they identify as the source and cause of its achievements. They then look back at their own society where such technological achievements were lacking, a fact they attribute, in turn, to the absence of that heightened state of ideological self-awareness.8
The key notion here, the French analyst Olivier Roy explains, is the rather surprising notion that ideologies are "the key to the West's technical development." This assumption leads fundamentalists "to develop a modern political ideology based on Islam, which they see as the only way to come to terms with the modern world and the best means of confronting foreign imperialism."9
Some of the leading fundamentalists fit this pattern. The Egyptian Sayyid Qutb went to the United States in 1948 as an admirer of things American, then "returned" to Islam during his two years resident there,10 becoming one of the most influential fundamentalist thinkers of our time. `Ali Shari`ati of Iran lived five years in Paris, 1960-65; from this experience came the key ideas of the Islamic Revolution. In other cases, fundamentalist thinkers do not actually live in the West but absorb its ways at a distance by learning a Western language and immersing themselves in Western ideas, as did the Indo-Pakistani journalist, thinker and politician Sayyid Abul A`la Mawdudi (1903-79). In still other cases, reading Western works in translation serves just as well. Morteza Motahhari, a leading acolyte of Khomeini's, made as thorough a study of Marxism as possible in the Persian language.
Many of fundamentalism's intellectual lights share a background of technical accomplishment. Erbakan quickly rose to the top of the engineering profession in Turkey as a full professor at Istanbul Technical University, director at a factory producing diesel motors, and even head of the country's Chamber of Commerce. His political party is known sometimes as the "engineers' party." Layth Shubaylat, a Jordanian firebrand, is also president of the Jordanian Engineers Association. These men take special pride in being able to challenge the West in the area of its greatest strength.
Actual terrorists also tend to be science-oriented, though less accomplished. Ramzi Yusuf, the accused mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing, is an electronics engineer and explosives expert with an advanced degree from the Swansea Institute in South Wales;11 Nidal Ayyad was an up-and-coming chemical engineer at Allied Signal; and Eyad Ismail studied computers and engineering at Wichita State University. This same pattern holds in the Middle East: Salah `Ali `Uthman, one of three terrorists who attacked a bus in Jerusalem on 1 July 1993, was a student of computer science at the University in Gaza. The most notorious anti-Zionist terrorist of recent years is one Yahya Ayyash, nicknamed "The Engineer." Many fundamentalist Egyptians who engage in violence against the regime have science degrees, including the leader of the gang that assassinated Anwar as-Sadat in 1981.
Fundamentalist knowledge of the West seems to focus on engineering and comedies, but it's not limited to that. In a statement of beliefs from his Manhattan jail cell, Ramzi Yusuf cited the Encyclopedia Britannica and The New York Times, as well as one of Newton's laws of physics.12 This man is no bumpkin. One of his friends says that the remarkable thing about Ramzi Yusuf was his apparent pleasure in learning about new languages, cultures, and peoples, then proceeding to blow them up.13
So much knowledge of the West points to who fundamentalists are: not peasants living in the unchanging countryside but modern, thoroughly urbanized individuals, many of them university graduates. Notwithstanding all their talk about recreating the society of the Prophet Muhammad, fundamentalists are modern individuals at the forefront of coping with modern life. These are women struggling to keep their virtue on extremely packed buses, entrepreneurs attempting to live by the Qur'anic strictures on usury, and engineers working out the spiritual significance of the computer.
Ignorance of Traditional Islam
In contrast to this ostentatious familiarity with Western ways, fundamentalists are distant from their own culture. Turabi admitted to a French interviewer, "I know the history of France better than the history of Sudan, I love your culture, your painters, your musicians."14 He offered no comparable praise for Sudanese painters and musicians. Having found Islam on their own as adults, many fundamentalists are ignorant of their own history and traditions. Some of "the new generation of Islamic fundamentalists," Martin Kramer notes, "are born-again Muslims, ill-acquainted with Islamic tradition, who often see Islam only as an ideology of power."15 Tunisia's Minister of Religion Ali Chebbi goes further, saying that they "They ignore the fundamental facts of Islam."16 Like Mawdudi, these autodidacts mix a bit of this and that, as Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr explains:
Mawdudi's formulation was by no means rooted in traditional Islam. He adopted modern ideas and values, mechanisms, procedures, and idioms, weaving them into an Islamic fabric. . . . he sought not to resurrect an atavistic order but to modernize the traditional conception of Islamic thought and life. His vision represented a clear break with Islamic tradition and a fundamentally new reading of Islam which took its cue from modern thought.17
On reflection, this lack of knowledge should not be surprising. Fundamentalists are individuals educated in modern ways who seek solutions to modern problems; of course they know the West's ways better than their own country's traditions. The Prophet may inspire, but they approach him through the filter of the late twentieth century. In the process, they unintentionally substitute Western ways for those of traditional Islam.
Traditional Islam - the immensely rewarding faith of nearly a billion adherents - developed a civilization that for over a millennium gave order to the lives of young and old, rich and poor, sophisticate and ignorant, Moroccan and Malaysian. Alienated from this tradition, fundamentalists dispense with it in the chimerical effort to return to the pure and simple ways of Muhammad. To connect spiritually to the first years of Islam, when the Prophet was alive and the faith was new, they seek to skip back thirteen centuries. The most mundane issues inspire them to recall the Prophet's times. Thus, an author portrays the "survival tactics" employed by Muslim students at American universities to retain their Islamic identity as "much like the early Muslims during the Hijra [from Mecca to Medina]."18
Fundamentalists see themselves not as tradition-bound but as engaged in a highly novel enterprise. According to Iran's spiritual leader, `Ali Hoseyni Khamene'i, "The Islamic system that the imam [Khomeini] created . . . has not existed in the course of history, except at the beginning [of Islam], and does not exist elsewhere in the world today."19 Ghannushi similarly asserts that "Islam is ancient but the Islamist movement is recent."20 In rejecting a whole millennium, the fundamentalists throw out a great deal of their own legacy, from the great corpus of Qur'anic scholarship to the finely worked interpretations of law. They are not absorbed by the splendors of mosque architecture.
On the contrary, they admire efficient factories and armies. For them, no less than for a Swedish aid official, the Muslim world is backward and they too urgently seek its overhaul through the application of modern means. When this process goes slowly, they blame the West for withholding its technology. Thus, `Ali Akbar Mohtashemi, the Iranian arch-radical, plaintively bemoans that "the United States and the West will never give us the technology" to pursue what he quaintly calls "the science of industrialization."21
The fundamentalists' goal turns out to be not a genuinely Islamic order but an Islamic-flavored version of Western reality. This is particularly apparent in four areas: religion, daily life, politics, and the law.
I. Imitating Christianity
It's certainly not their intent, but fundamentalist Muslims have introduced some distinctly Christian notions into their Islam.
Church-like structure. Traditional Islam was characterized by informal organizations. Virtually every major decision - establishing a canonical text of the Qur'an, excluding philosophical inquiry, or choosing which religious scholars to heed - was reached in an unstructured and consensual way. This has been the genius of the religion, and it meant that rulers who tried to control the religious institution usually failed.
Fundamentalists, ignorant of this legacy, have set up church-like structures. The trend began in Saudi Arabia, where the authorities built a raft of new institutions. Already in 1979, Khalid Durán wrote about the emergence of a "priestly hierarchy with all its churchly paraphernalia":
A number of religious functionaries have come into being whose posts were previously unheard of, for example: the Secretary of the Muslim World League, the Secretary General of the Islamic Conference, the Rector of the Islamic University in Medina, and so [on] and so forth. For the first time in history the imam of the Ka'ba has been sent on tour of foreign countries as if he were an Apostolic Nuntius.22
The Islamic Republic of Iran soon followed the Saudi model and went beyond it, Shahrough Akhavi explains, to institute a Catholic-style control of the clergy:
the centralization that has occurred in the religious institution in Iran is unprecedented, and actions have been taken that resemble patterns in the ecclesiastical church tradition familiar in the West. For example, in 1982, Khomeini encouraged the "defrocking" and "excommunication" of his chief rival, Ayatollah Muhammad Kazim Shari`atmadari (d. 1986), although no machinery for this has ever existed in Islam. Other trends, such as centralized control over budgets, appointments to the professoriate, curricula in the seminaries, the creation of religious militias, monopolizing the representation of interests, and mounting a Kulturkampf in the realm of the arts, the family, and other social issues tell of the growing tendency to create an "Islamic episcopacy" in Iran.
Even more striking, Akhavi notes, is how Khomeini made himself pope:
Khomeini's practice of issuing authoritative fatwas, obedience to which is made compulsory, comes close to endowing the top jurist with powers not dissimilar to those of the pope in the Catholic church. After all, compliance with a particular cleric's fatwas in the past had not been mandatory.23
In creating this faux Christian hierarchy, fundamentalists invented something more Western than Islamic.
Friday as sabbath. In a similar confusion, fundamentalists have turned Fridays into a Sabbath, something it had not previously been. Traditionally, Friday was a day of congregating for prayer, not a day of rest. Indeed, the whole idea of sabbath is alien to the vehemently monotheistic spirit of Islam, which deems the notion of God needing a day of rest falsely anthropomorphic. Instead, the Qur'an (62:9-10) instructs Muslims to "leave off business" only while praying; once finished, they should "disperse through the land and seek God's bounty" - in other words, engage in commerce. A day of rest so smacks of Jewish and Christian practice, some traditional Islamic authorities actually discouraged taking Friday off. In most places and times, Muslims did work on Fridays, interrupted only by the communal service.
In modern times, Muslim states imitated Europe and adopted a day of rest. The Ottoman Empire began closing government offices on Thursday, a religiously neutral day, in 1829. Christian imperialists imposed Sunday as the weekly day of rest throughout their colonies, a practice Muslim rulers adopted as well; for example, the Republic of Turkey did so in 1935, responding in large part to business interests that preferred to be on a European calendar. Upon independence, virtually every Muslim government inherited the Sunday rest and maintained it. S. D. Goitein, the foremost scholar of this subject, notes that Muslim states did so "in response to the exigencies of modern life and in imitation of Western precedent."24
Recently, as the Sunday sabbath came to be seen as too Western, Muslim rulers asserted their Islamic identities by instituting Friday as the day off. Little did they realize that, in so doing, they perpetuated a specifically Judeo-Christian custom. And as Fridays have turned into a holiday (for family excursions, spectator sports, etc.), Muslims have imitated the Western weekend.25
In other ways too, Muslims have become Christianized. With the solitary exception of the Isma`ilis, traditional Muslims did not organize to spread Islam; missionary work was undertaken by individuals such as merchants. Only in the nineteenth century, when faced with organized Christian missionary work, did the Muslims respond in kind. Or this description of athletic games sponsored by an offshoot of Hamas within Israel proper, part of an effort to make sure apprentice fundamentalists get trained in the martial arts:
Games are always preceded by prayer and proceed without any interruptions, in perfect sportsmanship, without any cursing and bickering between players and fans. Players wear long trousers, and after the games the members of each team embrace their opponents, enjoy a festive meal, and conduct a joint prayer for both teams.26
If one looks at the order that fundamentalists have created, it is clear how much they take from the West. Take the structure of their governments: Even the Ayatollah Khomeini, who was more traditional that most Islamists, founded a government supposedly founded on the pure principles of Shi`i Islam that is a republic based on a constitution that represents the nation via the decisions of a parliament which is chosen through popular elections - every one of these Western concepts.27
When it comes to understanding history, traditional Muslims saw the world either as static or as steadily in decline. The era of Muhammad was the best, and every generation since has witnessed degeneration. The idea of progress, so endemic to the modern West, is alien. In this world view, "there is no place for development, progress or social advancement and improvement."28 In contrast, the fundamentalists assume profound changes are underway, and very possibly for the better. Sayyid Qutb, one of the most influential fundamentalist thinkers, accepted the Marxist notion of stages of history, adding only an Islamic stage. Around 1950, he predicted the twentieth century would witness the demise of the capitalism in the West and the blossoming of communism. But communism, although it would satisfy material needs, would not fulfill the spiritual side. "At that stage, Qutb argued, Islam would be the only candidate for the leadership of humanity."29 Well, Qutb had a few details wrong, but what is of special interest is how he accepts the Marxist (and very un-Islamic) notion of history unfolding in stages.
But perhaps the most striking Westernisms of daily life that fundamentalist Muslims have introduced are associated with women. Taking up the veil and separating women from men may appear to be an archaism, and that's certainly how the fundamentalists see these acts, but it isn't. Fundamentalists actually espouse an outlook more akin to Western-style feminism than anything in traditional Islam.
Traditional Muslim men certainly did not take pride in the freedom and independence of their women; but fundamentalists do. Ahmad al-Banna, son of the founder of Egypt's Muslim Brethren, adopts a feminist outlook that leads him to reinterpret Muslim history according to Western standards: "Muslim women have been free and independent for fifteen centuries. Why should we follow the example of Western women, so dependent on their husbands in material matters?"30
Traditional Muslim men took pride in their women staying home; in well-to-do households, they almost never left its confines. Hasan at-Turabi has something quite different in mind: "Today in Sudan, women are in the army, in the police, in the ministries, everywhere, on the same footing as men."31 Turabi proudly speaks of the Islamic movement having helped "liberate women."32 Following the adage that "the best mosque for women is the inner part of the house," traditional women prayed at home, and female quarters in mosques were slighted; but fundamentalist women regularly attend public services and new mosques consequently allot far more space to women's sections.
For centuries, a woman's veil served primarily to help her retain her virtue; today, it serves the feminist goal of facilitating a career. Muslim women who wear "Islamic dress," writes a Western analyst, are usually well educated, often in the most prestigious university faculties of medicine, engineering, and the sciences, and their dress signifies that although they pursue an education and career in the public sphere, they are religious, moral women. Whereas other women are frequently harassed in the public sphere, such women are honored and even feared. By the late 1980s, Islamic dress had become the norm for middle-class women who do not want to compromise their reputation by their public activities. Boutiques offer Parisian-style fashions adopted to Islamic modesty standards.33
The establishment of an Islamic order in Iran has, ironically perhaps, opened many opportunities outside the house for pious women. They do work in the labor force and famously serve in the military. A parliamentary leader boasts, not without reason, about Iran having the best feminist record in the Middle East, and points to the number of women in higher education.34 In keeping with this spirit, one of Khomeini's grand-daughters attended law school and then lived in London with her husband, a cardiac surgeon in training; another organizes women's sporting events. Sayyid Muhammad Khatami, the president of Iran, proudly declared that "Under the Islamic Republic, women have full rights to participate in social, cultural, and political activities."35
If the veil used to symbolize a woman's uncontrollable (and therefore destructive) sexuality, fundamentalists see it as the sign of her competence. Turabi declares, "I am for equality between the sexes" and goes on to explain how covering up helps achieve this key feminist goal: "A woman who is not veiled is not the equal of men. She is not looked on as one would look on a man. She is looked at to see if she is beautiful, if she is desirable. When she is veiled, she is considered a human being, not an object of pleasure, not an erotic image."36
Curiously, some fundamentalists see the veil representing not careers and equality, but something quite different: positive sexuality. Samira Isma`ili, a woman in Sharjah, hints at this when she points out an implication of being completely covered: "Being anonymous gives me freedom."37Shabbir Akhtar, a British writer, is more explicit. For him, the veil serves "to create a truly erotic culture in which one dispenses with the need for the artificial excitement that pornography provides."38 Traditional Muslims, it hardly needs emphasizing, did not see veils as a substitute for pornography.
III. Turning Islam into Ideology
Traditional Islam emphasized man's relations with God while playing down his relations to the state. Law loomed very large, politics small. Over the centuries, pious Muslims avoided the government, which meant almost nothing to them but trouble (taxes, conscription, corvée labor). On the other hand, they made great efforts to live by the Shari`a.
Infected by the twentieth-century disease, fundamentalists make politics "the heart" of their program.39 They see Islam less as the structure in which individuals make their lives and more as an ideology for running whole societies. Declaring "Islam is the solution," they hold with Khamene'i of Iran that Islam "is rich with instructions for ruling a state, running an economy, establishing social links and relationships among the people and instructions for running a family."40 For fundamentalists, Islam represents the path to power. As a very high Egyptian official observes, to them "Islam is not precepts or worship, but a system of government."41 Olivier Roy finds the fundamentalist inspiration to be far more mundane than spiritual: "For many of them, the return to religion has been brought about through their experience in politics, and not as a result of their religious belief."42
Revealingly, fundamentalists compare Islam not to other religions but to other ideologies. "We are not socialist, we are not capitalist, we are Islamic"43 says Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia. Egypt's Muslim Brethren assert they are neither socialist nor capitalist, but "Muslims."44 This comparison may seem overblown - socialism and capitalism are universal, fundamentalist Islam limited to Muslim - but it is not, for fundamentalists purvey their ideology to non-Muslims too. In one striking instance, Khomeini in January 1989 sent a letter to Mikhail Gorbachev asserting the universality of Islam. Noting the collapse of communist ideology, he implored the Soviet president not to turn westward for a replacement but to Islam.
I strongly urge that in breaking down the walls of Marxist fantasies you do not fall into the prison of the West and the Great Satan. . . . I call upon you seriously to study and conduct research into Islam. . . . I openly announce that the Islamic Republic of Iran, as the greatest and most powerful base of the Islamic world, can easily help fill up the ideological vacuum of your system.45
As interpreted by a leading Iranian official, this letter "intended to put an end to . . . views that we are only speaking about the world of Islam. We are speaking for the world."46 It may even be the case - Khomeini only hints at this - that Islam for him had become so disembodied from faith, he foresaw a non-Muslim like Gorbachev adopting Islamic ways without becoming a Muslim. If so, the transformation of Islam from faith to political construct is then total.
IV. Overhauling the Sacred Law
Even as fundamentalists pay homage to Islam's sacred law, they turn it into a Western-style code and three age-old characteristics of the Shari`a disappear: its elaboration by independent scholars, its precedence over state interests, and its application to persons, rather than territories.
Developed by the state. Through the centuries, jurists (faqihs) wrote and interpreted the Islamic law on their own, with little control by governments. The jurists early on established that they were answerable to God, not to the prince. Joseph Schacht, a leading scholar of this subject explains: "the caliph, though otherwise the absolute chief of the community of Muslims, had not the right to legislate but only to make administrative regulations with the limits laid down by the sacred Law."47 Rulers did try to dictate terms to jurists but failed. In the years a.d. 833-849, four successive caliphs imposed their understanding of the Qur'an's nature (that it was created by God, as opposed to the religious scholars, who said it had always existed). Despite energetic attempts by the caliphs (which included the flogging of a very eminent religious authority), the effort failed, and with it the pretensions of politicians to define the contents of Islam.
The jurists retained full control of Islamic law until the nineteenth century, when the British, French, and other European rulers codified the Shari`a as a European-style body of state law. Independent Muslim states, such as the Ottoman Empire, followed the European lead and also codified the Shari`a. With independence, all the Muslim rulers maintained the European habit of keeping the law firmly under state control; by the 1960s, only in Saudi Arabia did it remained autonomous.
Starting in 1969, Mu`ammar al-Qadhdhafi of Libya started the new wave of expanding the Shar`i content of state laws (for example, in the criminal statutes). He did so as ruler, using the state apparatus to compel jurists to carry out his orders. Fundamentalist Muslims in many countries then emulated Qadhdhafi, giving the state authority over the Shari`a even as they extended its purview. They made no effort to revert to the jurists' law of old but continued practices begun by the European powers.
When fundamentalists do on rare occasions protest this state domination of the law, it carries little conviction. Turabi remarks that "Islamic government is not total because it is Islam that is a total way of life, and if you reduce it to government, then government would be omnipotent, and that is not Islam."48 Turabi's enormous power in the Sudan makes it hard to take this critique seriously. Fundamentalists accept Western ways because, first, they know the imperial system far better than the traditional Muslim one, and so perpetuate its customs. Second, reverting to the traditional Muslim way would, Ann Mayer of the Wharton School points out, "entail that governments relinquish the power that they had gained over legal systems when European-style codified law was originally adopted,"49 and why should they do that?
State interests take priority. The state takeover invariably causes problems. Perhaps most important is that, in the traditional arrangement, the jurists jealously maintained their independence in interpreting the law. They insisted on God's imperatives taking absolute priority over those of the ruler. Such acts as prayer, the fast of Ramadan, or the pilgrimage to Mecca, they insisted, must never be subjected to the whims of despots. Jurists got their way, for hardly a single king or president, not even so ardent a secularist as Turkey's Kemal Atatürk, had the temerity to interfere with the Lord's commandments.
But Ayatollah Khomeini did. In January 1988, he issued an edict flatly contravening this ancient Islamic assumption. In a remarkable but little-noted document, the ayatollah asserted that "The government is authorized unilaterally to abolish its lawful accords with the people and . . . to prevent any matter, be it spiritual or material, that poses a threat to its interests." This means that, "for Islam, the requirements of government supersede every tenet, including even those of prayer, fasting and pilgrimage to Mecca."50 Subordinating these acts to raison d'état has the effect of diminishing the Shari`a beyond recognition.
Khomeini - a classical educated scholar, an authority on Islamic law,51 and an eminent religious figure - justified this edict on the grounds that the interests of the Islamic Republic were synonymous with the interests of Islam itself. But this hardly explains so radical and unprecedented a step. The real reason lies in the fact that, like countless other twentieth-century rulers, he sought control of his country's spiritual life. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao subordinated religion to the state, so why not Khomeini? His edict subordinated Islam to the total state. Khomeini may have looked medieval but he was a man of his times, deeply affected by totalitarian ideas emanating from the West.
More generally, it had been the case that only highly qualified jurists could rule on the law. Now anyone with political power - voter, parliamentarian, or military despot - has potential authority over the outcome. This inevitably leads to the law becoming a tool of state power.
Applies to geographic jurisdictions. In traditional Islam (as in Judaism), laws apply to the individual, not (as in the West) to the territory. It matters not whether a Muslim lives here or there, in the homeland or in the diaspora; he must follow the Shari`a. Conversely, a non-Muslim living in a Muslim country need not follow its directives. For example, a Muslim may not drink whisky whether he lives in Tehran or Los Angeles; and a non-Muslim may imbibe in either place. This leads to complex situations whereby one set of rules applies to a Muslim thief who robs a Muslim, another to a Christian who robs a Christian, and so forth. The key is who you are, not where you are.
In contrast, European notions of law are premised on jurisdictions. Commit a crime in this town or state and you get one punishment, another in the next town over. Even highways have their own rules. Where you are, not who you are, is what counts.
Ignorant of the spirit underlying the Shari`a, fundamentalists enforce it along territorial, not personal lines; Turabi declares that Islam "accepts territory as the basis of jurisdiction."52 As a result, national differences have emerged. The Libyan government lashes all adulterers. Pakistan lashes unmarried offenders and stones married ones. The Sudan imprisons some and hangs others. Iran has even more punishments, including head shaving and a year's banishment.53 In the hands of fundamentalists, the Shari`a becomes just a variant of Western, territorial law.
This new understanding most dramatically affects non-Muslims, whose millennium-old exclusion from the Shari`a is over. Now they must live as virtual Muslims. `Umar `Abd ar-Rahman, the Egyptian sheikh in an American jail, is adamant on this subject: "it is very well known that no minority in any country has its own laws."54 `Abd al-`Aziz ibn Baz, the Saudi religious leader, calls on non-Muslims to fast during Ramadan. In Iran, foreign women may not wear nail polish - on the grounds that this leaves them unclean for (Islamic) prayer. Entering the country, the authorities provide female visitors with petrol-soaked rags and insist they wipe clean their varnished nails. A fundamentalist party in Malaysia wants to regulate how much time unrelated Chinese men and women may spend alone together.
This new interpretation of Islamic law creates enormous problems. Rather than fairly much leaving non-Muslims to regulate their own conduct, as did traditional Islam, fundamentalism seeks to intrude into their lives, fomenting enormous resentment and sometimes leading to violence. Palestinian Christians who raise pigs find their animals mysteriously poisoned. The million or two Christians living in the northern, predominantly Muslim, region of the Sudan must comply with virtually all the Shar`i regulations. In the southern Sudan, Islamic law prevails wherever the central government rules, although "certain" Shar`i provisions are not applied there;55 should the government conquer the whole South, all the provisions would probably go into effect, an expectation that does much to keep alive a forty-year civil war.
Despite themselves, the Islamists are Westernizers. Even in rejecting the West, they accept it. However reactionary in intent, Islamism imports not just modern but Western ideas and institutions. The Islamist dream of expunging the Western ways from Muslim life, in short, cannot succeed.
The resulting hybrid is more robust than it seems. Opponents of militant Islam often dismiss it as a regressive effort to avoid modern life and comfort themselves with the prediction that it is doomed to be left behind as modernization takes place. But this expectation seems mistaken; because it appeals most directly to Muslims contending with the challenges of modernity, Islamism's potential grows as do its numbers. Current trends suggest that it will remain a force for some time to come.
1Ash-Sharq al-Awsat, 17 March 1995.
A few additional examples:
The Indonesian government has insisted that Muslims and non-Muslims alike in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam district of Muslim-devout Aceh province should be tried by a planned Islamic Court. Non-Muslims accused of committing crimes such as theft and adultery, would be tried under the Sharia inspired bylaws, state secretary Yusril Ihza Mahendra told the special committee deliberating a crucial bill on Aceh's future administration.
Mahendra, responding to the proposals of several legislators who wanted non-Muslims to be given the freedom to choose under which law they would be tried, said it would only create legal uncertainty. "Should such freedom be given, non-Muslims will certainly choose to be tried under the Criminal Code, because it carries more lenient punishment," Yusril told the hearing, held to discuss the authority of the planned Islamic Court, also known as Mahkamah Sharia.
Yusril said that in the case of adultery, non-Muslims who committed adultery with Muslims would undoubtedly opt for trial by Indonesia's penal code, because it was more lenient than stoning or other forms of corporal punishment stipulated under Islamic Law. ... Yusril said later in the hearing that non-Muslims could be exempted for trial by the Islamic Court only in cases related to domestic matters, such as distribution of wealth as well as business and monetary issues.
(April 26, 2006)
The Emerging Interfaith Youth MovementNote to Readers of The Faith Divide: This week we will be launching two new features. One is a weekly guest writer, who will post on Wednesdays. The second is "The Bridge", which is a brief description of an individual, an activity or a story bridging the faith divide. I will continue to write twice a week, posting on Mondays and Fridays.
This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3492