This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1738
March 11, 2006
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4793546.stm Dutch jail 'terror group' Muslims | |||
Two men in the so-called Hofstad group were jailed for 15 and 13 years for using a hand grenade against police. The court did not pass a jail term on the group's leader, Mohammed Bouyeri, as he is already serving life in prison for murdering film-maker Theo van Gogh. The trial has been treated as a test of the Netherlands' tough new anti-terror legislation. The new laws enable the Dutch government to prosecute people suspected of having the intention to commit terrorist acts.
Prosecutors had called for members of the Hofstad group to be jailed for up to 20 years, accusing them of inciting hatred of non-Muslims. Five suspects in the trial were acquitted by the court, which ruled there was not enough evidence to show they were involved in planning terrorism. Jason Walters, the son of a US citizen, received the heaviest sentence of 15 years, while Ismael Aknikh was given a 13-year jail term. Both men were alleged to have worked together during a confrontation with police in November 2004, in which a hand grenade was thrown, injuring five officers. None of the other accused was found to have carried out any terrorist acts. They received sentences ranging from one to five years. 'Destroying democracy' The complex legal ruling, which took five hours to deliver, said most of the accused were guilty of promoting a violent ideology. "Anyone who preaches hate and violence lays the basis for committing crimes directed at instilling fear among the people and destroying Dutch democracy," the ruling said. "Threatening terrorist crimes strikes public order at its heart." The judge said Bouyeri, although convicted of leading the group, could not be punished further as he was already serving life for Mr Van Gogh's murder. Mr Van Gogh, whose best-known film attacked the treatment of women in Muslim societies, was stabbed to death in an Amsterdam street in November 2004. |
---------------
Court : Hofstadgroep are not terrorists- attack plans not proven
http://www.nisnews.nl/public/110306_1.htm
AMSTERDAM, 11/03/06 - The district court in The Hague ruled Friday that the Hofstad group is a terrorist organisation. But it considered it was not proven that the group had carrying out terrorist attacks as its immediate goal. Nine of the 14 Muslims on trial were part of a criminal organisation with terrorist aims, the court ruled. The heaviest sentences were for Jason Walters and Ismail Akhnikh, who were given 15 and 13 years in jail respectively. Nouriddin el Fatmi was given five years. Mohammed Bouyeri, the murderer of Theo van Gogh, was the leader of the group, according to the judges. But no penalty could be imposed on him as he has already been given a life sentence for murder with terrorist aims. Above Bouyeri, there was a Syrian as ideological leader who has disappeared without trace, though he is suspected of being in Syria. For the first time, suspects have now been convicted for participation in a 'criminal organisation with terrorist objective' on the basis of new legislation that came into effect on 10 August 2004. The judges however used a remarkably strict interpretation of the 'terrorist objective' concept in their verdict. Under the new law, the 'objective' is the 'immediate goal' that is aimed for. Although "the planning and committing" of attacks on objects and persons "was perhaps indeed the ultimate goal," the group had as their immediate goal sedition, incitement to hatred and threatening with terrorist attacks. This does make it a terrorist organisation, according to the verdict. The court believes that Bouyeri had help with the murder of Van Gogh. But evidence of this was not strong enough. A prisoner told the police that Hofstad suspect Bilal Lamrani told him that he supplied the weapon and the bicycle used by Bouyeri for the murder. Although this witness later withdrew his statement as a fabrication, the judge ruled that the statement was true all right, but still found it insufficiently hard evidence. Walters and Akhnikh wounded five members of a swat team with a hand grenade on 10 November 2004. The judge considered multiple attempted murder proven. But remarkably, the court did not see the attack as a terrorist crime as it might have been the result of hatred of the police, which had nothing to do with the radical Islamic ideology of the suspects. The police raided the home of Walters and Akhnikh in The Hague eight days after Van Gogh's murder. The two had counted on the raid beforehand, and agreed that one of them would throw a hand grenade as soon as the door was rammed. Walters, an American convert, eventually threw it. Akhnikh was technically an accessory. The court also acquitted Walters and Akhnikh of hampering the functioning of MPs Wilders and Hirsi Ali. They threatened them with death in private conversations, but the two suspects could not know that they were being eavesdropped at that moment, according to the court. Nor did the judges consider that it was proven that Nouredinne El Fatmi wanted to commit an attack. On his arrest in Amsterdam on 22 June, he was carrying a rucksack with a loaded machine-gun with a silencer and dozens of bullets. The OM claimed El Fatmi was planning to assassinate Wilders and Hirsi Ali. The court ruled it was not certain that he possessed this weapon for the purpose of committing a terrorist crime, and not even for an ordinary crime. This may be plausible, but is not proven, was again the mantra of the judges here. In the four-hour verdict, the court acquitted five of the 14 suspects. They had already been released earlier because their possible sentence would be shorter or the same as the time they had already spent in pre-trial custody. For the same reason, three of the nine who were convicted were also released Friday. The OM had demanded 20 years for Walters and Akhnikh and 10 years for El Fatmi. It is likely that both the OM and most suspects' attorneys will appeal against the verdict. The whole case will then be tried over again. -------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article244359.ece |
zaterdag 11 maart 2006 uur. | |||||
Hofstadgroep is terreurorganisatie | |||||
Van onze verslaggeefsters | |||||
AMSTERDAM - De Haagse rechtbank beschouwt de Hofstadgroep als een terroristische organisatie met als oogmerk opruiing, bedreiging en het aanzetten tot haat. De rechters veroordeelden de diverse leden van de terreurorganisatie vrijdag tot celstraffen van een tot vijftien jaar. | |||||
Vier verdachten werden vrijgesproken. Zij waren volgens de rechters slechts passief lid van de organisatie. MohammedB. wordt gezien als initiator en leider van de groep. Hij kreeg geen straf opgelegd, omdat hij in zijn vorige proces al tot levenslang was veroordeeld. De zwaarste straffen kregen granaatwerper JasonW. en diens medeplichtige IsmailA., respectievelijk vijftien en dertien jaar cel. Nouredine elF., in juni vorig jaar aangehouden met een schietklaar machinegeweer, werd veroordeeld tot vijf jaar cel. Het werpen van de handgranaat en het voorhanden hebben van het vuurwapen ziet de rechtbank niet als terroristische misdrijven. Hoewel uit door de AIVD afgeluisterde gesprekken bleek dat JasonW. en IsmailA. op 10november 2004 als martelaren wilden sterven, acht de rechtbank niet bewezen dat de handgranaten gegooid zijn met de bedoeling de bevolking angst aan te jagen. Evenmin staat vast, oordeelde de rechtbank, dat ElF. op de dag van zijn arrestatie van plan was een terreurdaad te plegen. De rechtbank laat informatie afkomstig van de door de AIVD geleverde geluidsbanden van de Haagse Antheunisstraat zwaar meewegen. Die banden zijn niet onrechtmatig gekregen. Weliswaar is de geluidskwaliteit slecht en hebben diverse tolken ze talloze malen moeten afluisteren om te verstaan wat wordt gezegd. Maar, menen de rechters, de verdediging is uitgebreid in staat gesteld de banden zelf te beoordelen. Alleen fragmenten waarover de tolken het niet eens zijn, heeft de rechtbank buiten beschouwing gelaten. De rechters merkten op dat de straffen relatief zwaar zijn, omdat ‘bedreiging met terroristische misdrijven de openbare orde in het hart raken'. Wie haat zaait en geweld predikt, legt de basis voor de vernietiging van de Nederlandse rechtsorde, aldus de rechtbank. Premier Balkenende reageerde verheugd op het vonnis, dat volgens hem laat zien dat de aangescherpte terreurwetgeving werkt. Hij complimenteerde justitie en politie. ------------- http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article244340.ece
|
This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1738