This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1027
August 29, 2005
Letters From The Home Front War On Terror - The Bush Administration's Serious Missteps Regarding ISNA http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=isnabush%2Ehtm
August 29, 2005 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - For some reason spokesmen who claim to represent "moderate" American Islam are never scrutinized by the main stream media about their motives or in depth about the organizations that they represent. These groups are seldom - if ever - called to account as to why their members have been convicted of terror related offenses, support suicide bombing or raise funds which end up in the hands of jihadists. It strikes us as odd that journalists from such august organizations as the Washington Post, the New York Times and CBS news apparently know so little about the groups which serve as the spearhead of Islam in North America that they find themselves merely providing an uncritical forum for the public relations efforts of those organizations. This is why you will never hear the following asked of the Islamist lobby: "Why is American Islam put together in a manner not unlike an organized crime syndicate, ala La Cosa Nostra?" A benign explanation for such a query does not exactly jump out during even a cursory review of the history of the people involved, their radical statements, their support by Saudi Wahhabis and a web of troubling entanglements some of which have understandably drawn the attention of the Justice Department. Such is case with the Islamic Society of North America, an outgrowth of the Muslim Student Association. In keeping with above described model, it should not be surprising that the Islamic Society of North America [ISNA] serves as a holding company for much of American Islam. ISNA is funded by the Saudis and is used by them - a tool to assert and maintain ideological control of the movement. While so engaged it spreads Wahhabism. In hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism held October 14, 2003 J. Michael Waller an internationally renowned authority on terrorism declared that ISNA controls the ideological content of the majority [1,100 of 1,500] US mosques and that through its North American Islamic Trust [NAIT] owns or controls the physical assets of 75% of them. That is a stranglehold; call it religious monopolism. The control mechanism used against those not in the fold is simple and direct - the Wahhabis employ physical violence, storming into moderate Islamic congregations, assaulting and otherwise intimidating them.
"The dissidents tried to drive out the worshipers...knocking over a pregnant woman who later miscarried...the "scuffle" was one in a dramatic series of struggles at mosques throughout the country between fundamentalist and moderate Muslims...part of a Saudi-financed missionary project to spread the kingdom's harsh and highly political version of Islam, known as Wahhabism."Saudi form of Islam wars with moderates, St. Petersburg Times, March 11, 2003 ISNA has a myriad of associations which challenge its self-described moderation.
"...we found about a dozen charities, organizations or individuals under federal scrutiny for possible ties to terrorism that are linked in some way to ISNA - ties sources tell us have also placed ISNA under the federal microscope." -Images In Conflict, WTHR Indianapolis A look at some of ISNA's principals reveals their radical Islamist agenda:
Such individuals populate the infrastructure whereby mosques are strong-armed into orthodoxy. As noted by Reza F. Safa, author of "Inside Islam," since 1973 the Saudis have spent nearly 100 billion dollars spreading Wahhabism and that 80% of American mosques have been built by them and therefore fall under their control.
"But the main clearinghouse for Wahhabism in the United States is...the Islamic Society of North America. ISNA is subsidized by the Saudi government." - Saudi form of Islam wars with moderates, St. Petersburg Times, March 11, 2003
"The North American Islamic Trust was established in 1971 by the MSA of U.S. and Canada. NAIT provides protection and safeguarding for the assets of ISNA/MSA and other communities by holding their assets and real estate in "waqf."2 - NAIT website NAIT comprises four "divisions" which gives the parent organization micro-control over its harem of mosques.
So what do we have here, is this a religious organization or is it merely a Wahhabi version of a vertically organized monopolistic trust? Please consider the facts - outside funding from Saudi Arabia, home of Wahhabi Islam; an overriding umbrella organization comprised of many sub-groups and associations; a shadowy trust subsidiary that holds properties in common; foot soldiers - emissaries of violence - who enforce orthodoxy from the top down, crushing the true moderates.
"We feel this is very much a war for the heart and soul of our religion," said Jamaluddin Hoffman of the Islamic Supreme Council of America..."They [the Wahhabis] are going around telling people that we are heretics," said Agha Jafri, a leader of the Shia Muslim community in New York. "That we are the product of a Jewish conspiracy and we are not Muslims. Nobody is Muslim to them except themselves. They just hate us." And ISNA is at the center of this gangster-like universe. This is not the traditional manner in which religions are organized, in the United States or anywhere else in the world. The most innocent explanation is that this is the way business ventures are pursued - objectives identified, goals set and a method put into place to achieve them. In this manner, Islam Inc. has mechanized and automated the precept of Da'wa - a religiously mandated spreading of the Islamic faith - and used the enterprise to fraudulently install and maintain Wahhabism as the official face of "moderate" Islam in America. Wahhabism's long-term goal is no less than installing Sharia [Islamic law] as the governing force in America. That fact should be very troubling to people who get paid to worry about such things. Why such information remains far from common knowledge is a complex subject, but can be broadly stated:
1. The organizational tactics employed by these groups are designed to obfuscate and their spokesmen are deceitful. Conclusions: Given the previous analysis, we consider it outrageous that the Bush administration has apparently made the decision to send top aid and newly appointed State Dept public relations chief Karen Hughes - hat in hand - to the ISNA convention. If this plays out it will be an incredibly damaging move that will have a lasting and negative impact on the President's war on terror. It sends the message that this administration really has no conception of what it is fighting and how the Islamist movement is being advanced in North America. Actions like this prove that despite assurances that the flow of vital information between various governmental agencies has improved, that little progress has been made. Apparently this administration is unaware of what ISNA represents, that it is engaged in a vicious campaign to crush Islamic moderates and that the organization's IRS records have been requested by Senator Grassley's Finance Committee because of concern over the group's possible ties to terror funding. We call upon the Bush administration to reconsider this serious misstep and withdraw all support from the ISNA event immediately. In our opinion, an appropriate reaction would be to have the Department of Homeland Security placed ISNA and similar organizations on "watch" lists similar to those used to screen airline passengers and to immediately end the Muslim chaplaincy program until the training methods and vetting process can be fully examined. The Islamists and their representatives don't deserve recognition at any official level and they must no longer be included in the type of White House programs in which ISNA has ["Radical Muslim Group Invited To Participate In White House Faith Based Program Conference" March 1, 2005, PipeLineNews.org, William A. Mayer & Beila Rabinowitz] participated in the recent past. In our opinion they represent a significant security risk. We call on the US Department of Justice to increase its scrutiny of these groups and hold them to account for their individual and organizational ties to terrorism. We hope moreover, that they sharpen their focus with an eye to dismantling the Wahhabist infrastructure which has been allowed to dominate Islam in the United States. Excessive tolerance, attempts to negotiate with or find common ground with the Wahhabists is - in these times of suitcase nukes - nothing short of a suicide pact. Notes: 1. ISNA Grassley IRS Request December 22, 2003 2. "waqf" in Arabic means to hold or to confine, especially to be used for some special purpose. In short it is an Islamic trust mechanism. ©1999-2005 PipeLineNews.org, all rights reserved. | ||
----------------- MIM: 'Wake up and smell the Caliphate' - editor of Pakistan News complains of lack of caffeine at ISNA 'instant ummah' . http://www.pakistanlink.com/haniff/09212001.html
|
This item is available on the Militant Islam Monitor website, at http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1027